From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [RFC v1 7/8] xen: unwrap XEN_BACKEND from XEN_DOM0 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:05:14 +0000 Message-ID: <54DC88EA.1060906@citrix.com> References: <1423720996-3332-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1423720996-3332-8-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YLraL-0001WI-6W for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:05:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1423720996-3332-8-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: jgross@suse.com, mcgrof@suse.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/02/15 06:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > This unwraps XEN_BACKEND from depending on XEN_DOM0, it > instead makes it depend on the possible x86 backends and > under what scenerios its allowed under ARM. This is as per > the agreed upon Xen Kconfig changes [0]. [...] > --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig > @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ config XEN_DEV_EVTCHN > > config XEN_BACKEND > bool "Backend driver support" > - depends on XEN_DOM0 > + depends on ARM || ARM64 || (X86 && (XEN_PV || XEN_PVH || XEN_PVHVM)) You don't need X86 here. Just XEN_PV etc. is fine. David