From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:07:32 +0000 Message-ID: <54DC8974.5060908@citrix.com> References: <1423720996-3332-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YLrcP-0001o1-GD for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:07:37 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1423720996-3332-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: jgross@suse.com, mcgrof@suse.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/02/15 06:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > Here's the first shot at the Kconfig changes for Xen as discussed > on the mailing list a little while ago [0]. Let me know if you spot > any issues or if you'd like things split differently. I tried to > make things as atomic as possible, but not being too rediculous > on the atomicity of the changes, for instance the HVC changes > were reasonable to just fold into the other change it touched. > > Haven't gone to war with testing the Kconfig changes yet given this > is just the first RFC. If things look good please look for major > issues and let me know.# Can you spin a v2 and make a git branch available, please? I would like people to be able to easily try out the changes rather than looking at the diffs. If I haven't comment on a specific patch it's because I thought it looked ok. David