From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:17:49 +0100 Message-ID: <54DD268D.7050904@dachary.org> References: <54DA3A5B.5050509@dachary.org> <1520027977.15929683.1423693473209.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1586599856.17187011.1423778777774.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GVAQg6UcKQA9vReXwM7WP7taahnFv1CPV" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:43366 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751831AbbBLWRx (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:17:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1586599856.17187011.1423778777774.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development , Sage Weil , Tamil Muthamizhan , Zack Cerza , Sandon Van Ness This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GVAQg6UcKQA9vReXwM7WP7taahnFv1CPV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/02/2015 23:06, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > I linked all issues related to this release testing to the ticket http:= //tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 >=20 > After the team leads make a call of those, including environment issues= , I suggest re-running suites the failed again. >=20 > Loic, I'd re-run them in the Octo, since we already started there, if y= ou agree ? Sure :-) >=20 > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yuri Weinstein" > To: "Loic Dachary" > Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Sage Weil" , "Tamil Muthamizhan" > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:24:33 PM > Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE >=20 > I replied to individual suites runs, but just wanted to summarize QE va= lidation status. >=20 > The following suites were executed in the Octo lab (we will use Sepia i= n the future if nobody objects). >=20 > upgrade:dumpling > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ['45493'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10694 - Known "Won't fix" > "Assertion: osd/Watch.cc: 290: FAILED assert(!cb)" >=20 > *** Sam - pls confirm the "Won't fix" status. >=20 > ['45495', '45496', '45498', '45499', '45500'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10838 > "s3tests failed" >=20 > *** Yehuda - need your verdict on s3tests. >=20 > fs > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > All green ! >=20 > rados > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ['45054'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10841 > "Issued certificate has expired"=20 > *** Sandon pls comment. >=20 > ['45168', '45169'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10840 > coredump "ceph_test_filestore_idempotent_sequence" > *** Sam - pls comment >=20 > ['45215'] > Missing packages - no ticket FYI > "Failed to fetch http://apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com/archive.ubuntu.= com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages Hash Sum m= ismatch" >=20 > *** Zack, Sandon ? >=20 > ceph-deploy > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > Travis - pls suggest > In general I am not sure if we needed to test this - Sage? >=20 > rbd > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ['45365', '45366', '45367'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10842 > "unable to connect to apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com" >=20 > ['45349', '45350', '45351', '45355', '45356', '45357', '45363'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10802 > "error: image still has watchers"=20 > (duplicate of 10680) >=20 > *** Zack, Sandon, Josh - all environment noise, pls comment.=20 >=20 > rgw > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ['45382', '45390'] > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10843 > "s3tests failed" - could be related or duplicate of 10838 >=20 > *** Yehuda - same as issues in upgrades? >=20 > I am standing by for you analysis/replies and recommendations for next = steps. >=20 > Loic - let me know is you want to follow specific items in our backport= testing process that I missed here. > PS: I would think that you could've wanted to assign the release ticke= t to QE (me) for validation and at this point I could've re-assigned it b= ack to devel (you), a? >=20 > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yuri Weinstein" > Cc: "Ceph Development" > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:05:31 AM > Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE >=20 > Hi Yuri, >=20 > The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at https://github= =2Ecom/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports has been approved by Yehuda, = Josh and Sam and is ready for QE.=20 >=20 > For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3944c77= c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410 >=20 > I think it would be best for the QE tests to use the dumpling-backports= =2E The alternative would be to merge dumpling-backports into dumpling. H= owever, since testing may take a long time and require more patches, it p= robably is better to not do that iterative process on the dumpling branch= itself. As it is now, there already are a number of commits in the dumpl= ing branch that should really be in the dumpling-backports: they do not b= elong to v0.67.11 and are going to be released in v0.67.12. In the future= though, the dumpling branch will only receive commits that have been car= efully tested and all the integration work will be on the dumpling-backpo= rts branch exclusively. So that third parties do not have to worry that t= he dumpling branch contains commits that have not been tested yet. >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --GVAQg6UcKQA9vReXwM7WP7taahnFv1CPV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTdJo0ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23I+ACdGdcAqLH4Fb3jYMfQy3R2lQkp MgAAoJSG6/77u9w6sqvO5W/K8ey63yJv =yoVV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GVAQg6UcKQA9vReXwM7WP7taahnFv1CPV--