From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:16:47 +0100 Message-ID: <54E1B57F.3070201@dachary.org> References: <870DE8DBB716524BAE51B2D499EC81E40AA6CEB8@g01jpexmbyt24> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ArvWSBUGgScciqxep3FNeoS05dT3rPttB" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:44550 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755240AbbBPJQx (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:16:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <870DE8DBB716524BAE51B2D499EC81E40AA6CEB8@g01jpexmbyt24> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Miyamae, Takeshi" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Cc: "Shiozawa, Kensuke" , "Nakao, Takanori" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ArvWSBUGgScciqxep3FNeoS05dT3rPttB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 16/02/2015 08:37, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: > Dear Loic, >=20 > Thank you for your help on the pull request of SHEC last week. > We believe that marking experimental feature on SHEC was inevitable and= > the way to restrict the feature is proper. >=20 > By the way, could you let us know what are the conditions for removing > experimental feature marks in the future? > Are additional thorough tests required? The next step is to run integration tests with the shec plugin. The integ= ration tests have shown that the shec plugin does not disrupt anything. N= ow we should check if it works properly under stress and upgrades. I crea= ted two tickets for that purpose: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10886 : integration / theuthology integrat= ion / theuthology thrasher tests for the shec erasure code plugin http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10887 : erasure-code: allow upgrades for s= hec plugins It would be fantastic if you could work on http://tracker.ceph.com/issues= /7291 : it would make the integration of new erasure code plugins easier.= I realize that it is infrastructure work not directly of interest to the= shec plugin implementation. Running teuthology locally is non trivial, maybe we can provide you with = access to the community lab so that you can run teuthology suites against= the existing teuthology cluster (i.e. http://pulpito.ceph.com/). Would y= ou like me to ask ?=20 Cheers > Best regards, > Takeshi Miyamae >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --ArvWSBUGgScciqxep3FNeoS05dT3rPttB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlThtX8ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22D2ACfWNKJKNfKUKmaYVPo5YzmivQP Ff0AoJwX66+fqEnhOB19Jmpe4V3CUCOs =TAno -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ArvWSBUGgScciqxep3FNeoS05dT3rPttB--