From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, stefanha@redhat.com,
quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] unbreak dtrace tracing due to double _ in rdma names
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:06:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E22390.2090002@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424105885-12149-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com>
On 16/02/2015 17:58, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
>
> It looks like the dtrace trace code gets upset if you have trace names
> with __ in, which the migration/rdma.c code does.
>
> Rename the functions and the associated traces.
>
> Fixes: 733252deb8b7d37beacda5976c2769e18642b2fa
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
> ---
> migration/rdma.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> trace-events | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
> index fc351ea..e7d77f6 100644
> --- a/migration/rdma.c
> +++ b/migration/rdma.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_end(const RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block,
> return result;
> }
>
> -static int __qemu_rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr,
> +static int rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr,
> ram_addr_t block_offset, uint64_t length)
> {
> RDMALocalBlocks *local = &rdma->local_ram_blocks;
> @@ -551,13 +551,12 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr,
>
> g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *) block_offset, block);
>
> - trace___qemu_rdma_add_block(local->nb_blocks,
> - (uint64_t) block->local_host_addr, block->offset,
> - block->length,
> - (uint64_t) (block->local_host_addr + block->length),
> - BITS_TO_LONGS(block->nb_chunks) *
> - sizeof(unsigned long) * 8,
> - block->nb_chunks);
> + trace_rdma_add_block(local->nb_blocks, (uint64_t) block->local_host_addr,
> + block->offset, block->length,
> + (uint64_t) (block->local_host_addr + block->length),
> + BITS_TO_LONGS(block->nb_chunks) *
> + sizeof(unsigned long) * 8,
> + block->nb_chunks);
>
> local->nb_blocks++;
>
> @@ -572,7 +571,7 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr,
> static void qemu_rdma_init_one_block(void *host_addr,
> ram_addr_t block_offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque)
> {
> - __qemu_rdma_add_block(opaque, host_addr, block_offset, length);
> + rdma_add_block(opaque, host_addr, block_offset, length);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -595,7 +594,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_init_ram_blocks(RDMAContext *rdma)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int __qemu_rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, ram_addr_t block_offset)
> +static int rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, ram_addr_t block_offset)
> {
> RDMALocalBlocks *local = &rdma->local_ram_blocks;
> RDMALocalBlock *block = g_hash_table_lookup(rdma->blockmap,
> @@ -657,7 +656,7 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, ram_addr_t block_offset)
> local->block = NULL;
> }
>
> - trace___qemu_rdma_delete_block(local->nb_blocks,
> + trace_rdma_delete_block(local->nb_blocks,
> (uint64_t)block->local_host_addr,
> block->offset, block->length,
> (uint64_t)(block->local_host_addr + block->length),
> @@ -2190,8 +2189,7 @@ static void qemu_rdma_cleanup(RDMAContext *rdma)
>
> if (rdma->local_ram_blocks.block) {
> while (rdma->local_ram_blocks.nb_blocks) {
> - __qemu_rdma_delete_block(rdma,
> - rdma->local_ram_blocks.block->offset);
> + rdma_delete_block(rdma, rdma->local_ram_blocks.block->offset);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
> index 57f357f..378505f 100644
> --- a/trace-events
> +++ b/trace-events
> @@ -1337,8 +1337,6 @@ migrate_pending(uint64_t size, uint64_t max) "pending size %" PRIu64 " max %" PR
> migrate_transferred(uint64_t tranferred, uint64_t time_spent, double bandwidth, uint64_t size) "transferred %" PRIu64 " time_spent %" PRIu64 " bandwidth %g max_size %" PRId64
>
> # migration/rdma.c
> -__qemu_rdma_add_block(int block, uint64_t addr, uint64_t offset, uint64_t len, uint64_t end, uint64_t bits, int chunks) "Added Block: %d, addr: %" PRIu64 ", offset: %" PRIu64 " length: %" PRIu64 " end: %" PRIu64 " bits %" PRIu64 " chunks %d"
> -__qemu_rdma_delete_block(int block, uint64_t addr, uint64_t offset, uint64_t len, uint64_t end, uint64_t bits, int chunks) "Deleted Block: %d, addr: %" PRIu64 ", offset: %" PRIu64 " length: %" PRIu64 " end: %" PRIu64 " bits %" PRIu64 " chunks %d"
> qemu_dma_accept_incoming_migration(void) ""
> qemu_dma_accept_incoming_migration_accepted(void) ""
> qemu_rdma_accept_pin_state(bool pin) "%d"
> @@ -1392,6 +1390,8 @@ qemu_rdma_write_one_recvregres(int mykey, int theirkey, uint64_t chunk) "Receive
> qemu_rdma_write_one_sendreg(uint64_t chunk, int len, int index, int64_t offset) "Sending registration request chunk %" PRIu64 " for %d bytes, index: %d, offset: %" PRId64
> qemu_rdma_write_one_top(uint64_t chunks, uint64_t size) "Writing %" PRIu64 " chunks, (%" PRIu64 " MB)"
> qemu_rdma_write_one_zero(uint64_t chunk, int len, int index, int64_t offset) "Entire chunk is zero, sending compress: %" PRIu64 " for %d bytes, index: %d, offset: %" PRId64
> +rdma_add_block(int block, uint64_t addr, uint64_t offset, uint64_t len, uint64_t end, uint64_t bits, int chunks) "Added Block: %d, addr: %" PRIu64 ", offset: %" PRIu64 " length: %" PRIu64 " end: %" PRIu64 " bits %" PRIu64 " chunks %d"
> +rdma_delete_block(int block, uint64_t addr, uint64_t offset, uint64_t len, uint64_t end, uint64_t bits, int chunks) "Deleted Block: %d, addr: %" PRIu64 ", offset: %" PRIu64 " length: %" PRIu64 " end: %" PRIu64 " bits %" PRIu64 " chunks %d"
> rdma_start_incoming_migration(void) ""
> rdma_start_incoming_migration_after_dest_init(void) ""
> rdma_start_incoming_migration_after_rdma_listen(void) ""
>
Good thing even if it weren't for the broken tracing.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 16:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] unbreak dtrace tracing due to double _ in rdma names Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-02-16 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-02-16 18:03 ` Andreas Färber
2015-02-18 10:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54E22390.2090002@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.