From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC arch/sh/kernel/traps_64.c - unclear if/else construct (hpux compat layer)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:24:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E2600F.9060502@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150203093758.GA27963@opentech.at>
Hello Nicholas,
On 03.02.2015 10:37, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> scanning for if STATEMENT else STATEMENT triggered here - and it does look
> like it needs a fix-up or at least some comments.
>
> <snip?
> int hpux_sysfs(int opcode, unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2)
> {
> int fstype;
> ...
> /* String could be altered by userspace after strlen_user() */
> fsname[len - 1] = '\0';
>
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "that is '%s' as (char *)\n", fsname);
> if ( !strcmp(fsname, "hfs") ) {
> fstype = 0;
> } else {
> fstype = 0;
> }
>
> kfree(fsname);
>
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "returning fstype=%d\n", fstype);
> return fstype; /* something other than default */
> <snip>
>
> The if-else here has no effect and the printk will not convey any information
> as its always fstype==0, finally the return statement comment indicates that it
> should not be the default...
>
> Can't come up with a reasonable cleanup patch here - but this looks like it
> needs a review.
The hpux code is broken anyway.
I'm going to remove it from the tree.
Thanks!
Helge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-03 9:37 RFC arch/sh/kernel/traps_64.c - unclear if/else construct Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-16 21:24 ` Helge Deller [this message]
2015-02-17 8:49 ` RFC arch/sh/kernel/traps_64.c - unclear if/else construct (hpux compat layer) Paul Bolle
2015-02-17 15:15 ` Helge Deller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54E2600F.9060502@gmx.de \
--to=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.