Re: [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

[Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>]

On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> wrote:
>> As it is per our agreed upon changes we can in theory enable a
>> XEN_PVHVM system without XEN_PV or XEN_PVH. If this is indeed
>> desirable this poses an issue at build time
>
> And this also raises the question of whether or not we should make
> XEN_PVHVM a user selectable option, right now it is a def_bool and is
> therefore not human selectable. You can implicitly disable it by
> disabling PCI for example though. If we want that to be exposed to the
> user we can then enable some description of what that means, and the
> user will then be able to read / select / enable XEN_PV., XEN_PVHVM,
> XEN_PVH. Right now they'd only be able to select XEN_PV and/or
> XEN_PVH, XEN_PVHVM is implicit.

I think making XEN_PVHVM user selectable is okay.

Juergen