All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: Robert ABEL <rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>,
	khilman@deeprootsystems.com, tony@atomide.com,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:12:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E2F803.3070901@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424101741-24152-3-git-send-email-rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>

Hi Robert,

On 16/02/15 17:48, Robert ABEL wrote:
> GPMC uses GPMCFCLKDIVIDER during synchronous as well as asynchronous accesses
> in conjunction with WAITMONITORINGTIME. Thus, it's wrong to only program it for
> synchronous accesses. Remove the conditional.

Can you use the following wording from TRM instead?

as per am335x TRM (spruh73i.pdf), section 7.1.3.3.8.3.2

The WAITMONITORINGTIME is expressed as a number of GPMC_CLK clock cycles,
even though the access is defined as asynchronous, and no GPMC_CLK clock
is provided to the external device. Still, GPMCFCLKDIVIDER is used as a divider
for the GPMC clock, so it must be programmed to define the
correct WAITMONITORINGTIME delay.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert ABEL <rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> index 5c3639c..bae4a20 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> @@ -382,19 +382,14 @@ int gpmc_cs_set_timings(int cs, const struct gpmc_timings *t)
>  	if (gpmc_capability & GPMC_HAS_WR_ACCESS)
>  		GPMC_SET_ONE(GPMC_CS_CONFIG6, 24, 28, wr_access);
>  
> -	/* caller is expected to have initialized CONFIG1 to cover
> -	 * at least sync vs async
> -	 */
>  	l = gpmc_cs_read_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1);
> -	if (l & (GPMC_CONFIG1_READTYPE_SYNC | GPMC_CONFIG1_WRITETYPE_SYNC)) {
>  #ifdef DEBUG
> -		printk(KERN_INFO "GPMC CS%d CLK period is %lu ns (div %d)\n",
> -				cs, (div * gpmc_get_fclk_period()) / 1000, div);
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "GPMC CS%d CLK period is %lu ns (div %d)\n",
> +	       cs, (div * gpmc_get_fclk_period()) / 1000, div);
>  #endif
> -		l &= ~0x03;
> -		l |= (div - 1);
> -		gpmc_cs_write_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1, l);
> -	}
> +	l &= ~0x03;
> +	l |= (div - 1);
> +	gpmc_cs_write_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1, l);

Instead of this can we explicitly set the GPMC_CLK divider to 1 and hence
corresponding divider bits to 0 in the asynchronous case?
This is because the previously calculated "div" depends on synchronous clock which
might not be properly initialized for asynchronous devices.

AFAIK t->sync_clk is always 0 for asynchronous devices and gpmc_calc_divider(0)
will return 1 and your patch will work but still we shouldn't depend on sync_clk for
asynchronous devices so let's set this explicitly.

You can add a note like this
"For asynchronous devices we explicitly set GPMC_CLK to be equal to GPMC_FCLK.
Even though GPMC_CLK pin is not used by the asynchronous device we need it
for WAITMONITORINGTIME configuration in case wait-pin monitoring is used."

>  
>  	gpmc_cs_bool_timings(cs, &t->bool_timings);
>  
> 

cheers,
-roger

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: Robert ABEL <rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>,
	<khilman@deeprootsystems.com>, <tony@atomide.com>,
	<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:12:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E2F803.3070901@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424101741-24152-3-git-send-email-rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>

Hi Robert,

On 16/02/15 17:48, Robert ABEL wrote:
> GPMC uses GPMCFCLKDIVIDER during synchronous as well as asynchronous accesses
> in conjunction with WAITMONITORINGTIME. Thus, it's wrong to only program it for
> synchronous accesses. Remove the conditional.

Can you use the following wording from TRM instead?

as per am335x TRM (spruh73i.pdf), section 7.1.3.3.8.3.2

The WAITMONITORINGTIME is expressed as a number of GPMC_CLK clock cycles,
even though the access is defined as asynchronous, and no GPMC_CLK clock
is provided to the external device. Still, GPMCFCLKDIVIDER is used as a divider
for the GPMC clock, so it must be programmed to define the
correct WAITMONITORINGTIME delay.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert ABEL <rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> index 5c3639c..bae4a20 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> @@ -382,19 +382,14 @@ int gpmc_cs_set_timings(int cs, const struct gpmc_timings *t)
>  	if (gpmc_capability & GPMC_HAS_WR_ACCESS)
>  		GPMC_SET_ONE(GPMC_CS_CONFIG6, 24, 28, wr_access);
>  
> -	/* caller is expected to have initialized CONFIG1 to cover
> -	 * at least sync vs async
> -	 */
>  	l = gpmc_cs_read_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1);
> -	if (l & (GPMC_CONFIG1_READTYPE_SYNC | GPMC_CONFIG1_WRITETYPE_SYNC)) {
>  #ifdef DEBUG
> -		printk(KERN_INFO "GPMC CS%d CLK period is %lu ns (div %d)\n",
> -				cs, (div * gpmc_get_fclk_period()) / 1000, div);
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "GPMC CS%d CLK period is %lu ns (div %d)\n",
> +	       cs, (div * gpmc_get_fclk_period()) / 1000, div);
>  #endif
> -		l &= ~0x03;
> -		l |= (div - 1);
> -		gpmc_cs_write_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1, l);
> -	}
> +	l &= ~0x03;
> +	l |= (div - 1);
> +	gpmc_cs_write_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1, l);

Instead of this can we explicitly set the GPMC_CLK divider to 1 and hence
corresponding divider bits to 0 in the asynchronous case?
This is because the previously calculated "div" depends on synchronous clock which
might not be properly initialized for asynchronous devices.

AFAIK t->sync_clk is always 0 for asynchronous devices and gpmc_calc_divider(0)
will return 1 and your patch will work but still we shouldn't depend on sync_clk for
asynchronous devices so let's set this explicitly.

You can add a note like this
"For asynchronous devices we explicitly set GPMC_CLK to be equal to GPMC_FCLK.
Even though GPMC_CLK pin is not used by the asynchronous device we need it
for WAITMONITORINGTIME configuration in case wait-pin monitoring is used."

>  
>  	gpmc_cs_bool_timings(cs, &t->bool_timings);
>  
> 

cheers,
-roger

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-17  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-16 15:48 [PATCH 0/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: various fixes and bus children Robert ABEL
2015-02-16 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix debug output alignment Robert ABEL
2015-02-16 15:48   ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER Robert ABEL
2015-02-16 15:49     ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix WAITMONITORINGTIME divider bug Robert ABEL
2015-02-16 15:49       ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: add bus children Robert ABEL
2015-02-17  9:41         ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17  9:41           ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 13:57           ` Robert Abel
2015-02-17 14:15             ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 14:15               ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17  9:27       ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: fix WAITMONITORINGTIME divider bug Roger Quadros
2015-02-17  9:27         ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 13:48         ` Robert Abel
2015-02-17 13:56           ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 13:56             ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-16 17:10     ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER Tony Lindgren
2015-02-16 20:09       ` Robert Abel
2015-02-17  8:12     ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2015-02-17  8:12       ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 13:47       ` Robert Abel
     [not found]       ` <CAMdRc4F9B0ft-ExgQ1vHqwXMiONwWKn3FPCRDyHsjgGe1Dn_1w@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-17 13:52         ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 13:52           ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 14:06           ` Robert Abel
2015-02-17 14:25             ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-17 14:25               ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-23 21:38               ` Robert Abel
2015-02-23 22:03                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-24 11:53                 ` Roger Quadros
2015-02-24 11:53                   ` Roger Quadros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54E2F803.3070901@ti.com \
    --to=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rabel@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.