From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47068)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn>) id 1YNr9w-0008RW-Gd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:02:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn>) id 1YNr9s-0008SA-HW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:02:28 -0500
Received: from out1134-227.mail.aliyun.com ([42.120.134.227]:64505)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn>) id 1YNr9s-0008Ps-5q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:02:24 -0500
Message-ID: <54E3CA4D.4060801@sunrus.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:10:05 +0800
From: Chen Gang S <gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <54E1F540.5070900@sunrus.com.cn> <54E1F56E.803@sunrus.com.cn>
	<54E219F3.5090307@twiddle.net> <54E27485.9010908@sunrus.com.cn>
	<54E2A42A.3080108@twiddle.net> <54E2AEA0.2030503@sunrus.com.cn>
	<54E3653D.9090800@twiddle.net>
In-Reply-To: <54E3653D.9090800@twiddle.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6 v2] target-tilegx: Firstly add to qemu
 with minimized features
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, "walt@tilera.com" <walt@tilera.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 2/17/15 23:58, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 06:59 PM, Chen Gang S wrote:
>> I have the related documents, but I can not find pc register, and I
>> originally misunderstood lr can be treated as pc. After I know we can
>> not treat lr as pc, so I want to consult about it for confirmation.
> 
> Section 3.4 Program Counter, concisely describes the register.
> 

Yeah, thanks. But it does not say whether it can be seen by software
programmers or not (so I can not find pc register).

Excuse me, I have no any more experience for other architectures (only
know about x86), so after read Section 3.4, I originally misunderstood
lr is pc. When I know I can not see/find pc, I want to get confirmation.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed