From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Don Slutz Subject: Re: [OPTIONAL][PATCH v9 13/13] Add xen-hvm-param Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:51:50 -0500 Message-ID: <54E3FE46.6000906@terremark.com> References: <1424127915-27004-1-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com> <1424127915-27004-14-git-send-email-dslutz@verizon.com> <54E34C1A.4040208@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54E34C1A.4040208@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Don Slutz , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Kevin Tian , Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Jun Nakajima , Eddie Dong , Ian Jackson , Tim Deegan , George Dunlap , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Jan Beulich , Boris Ostrovsky , Suravee Suthikulpanit List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/17/15 09:11, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 16/02/15 23:05, Don Slutz wrote: >> A tool to get and set hvm param. >> >> Signed-off-by: Don Slutz > > I had completely forgotten that you did a tool like this before. > > Here is one I implemented myself, > > https://github.com/xenserver/xen-4.5.pg/commit/ec99115818abd1a98f04d5fae2481803ad21db2a > > I was specifically trying to make an extendible tool to avoid the > currently state of having $N single-purpose tools, and hopefully > replacing some of the other tools in a more consistent fashion. e.g. > xen-hvmcrash will only crash an hvm domain, but could very easily be > made to do the same to a PV domain (even using the same hypercalls I > believe, now that some PVH relaxing has occurred). > Having looked at xen-hvmcrash, I am still having questions about when it would make sense to use. I would think a pause, dump-core would give a better info to look at. > I have half an extension to this tool which will allow you to dump > various PV rings in the guest, and would like to see about merging > xen-hvmctx and xenctx together into this tool. > The merging of xen-hvmctx and xenctx is complex. I do not see that happening quickly. > Thoughts? > I combined tool does look good. These are just the quick thoughts. May have more later. -Don Slutz > ~Andrew >