From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNzkL-0003Iv-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 03:12:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNzkH-0001wX-Iz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 03:12:37 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:52723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNzkH-0000x0-E9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 03:12:33 -0500 Received: from [199.115.105.250] (helo=mail.parallels.com) by mx2.parallels.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YNzij-0004mO-II for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:10:57 -0800 Message-ID: <54E4490A.2030706@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:10:50 +0300 From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] RFC RFC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Can anybody explain what the reasons, politics and consequences of adding RFC into patch header in this mailing list? I think, it is not worth to add this information to http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch -- Best regards, Vladimir