From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:03:07 +0000 Message-ID: <54E4635B.5000906@citrix.com> References: <1423720996-3332-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <54DC8974.5060908@citrix.com> <54E2F040.5020807@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YO1TO-00052w-D0 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:03:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54E2F040.5020807@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Juergen Gross , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , David Vrabel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Boris Ostrovsky List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: > > If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build > enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other > files in arch/x86/xen. Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes? I don't really like scope-creep in patch series. David