From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: <54E46594.7000206@suse.com> References: <1423720996-3332-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <54DC8974.5060908@citrix.com> <54E2F040.5020807@suse.com> <54E4635B.5000906@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YO1cg-0005k3-EJ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:12:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54E4635B.5000906@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Boris Ostrovsky List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote: > On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: >> >> If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build >> enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other >> files in arch/x86/xen. > > Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes? I don't really like > scope-creep in patch series. Are you sure this is possible? XEN will be configured in more cases as today: this is the result of being able to build pv-drivers for hvm domains. BTW: it was you who wanted XEN_PVHVM to be implying XEN. So today the complete directory arch/x86/xen isn't built for non-pv kernels. Do you really want to change this? I don't think this is acceptable. Juergen