From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YO61p-0005VH-F4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:55:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YO61m-0007Nw-2a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:55:05 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:52497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YO61l-0007Ln-TW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:55:02 -0500 Message-ID: <54E4A7B9.6040507@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:54:49 +0300 From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54E4490A.2030706@parallels.com> <54E49B4E.4020407@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54E49B4E.4020407@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC RFC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 18.02.2015 17:01, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/18/2015 01:10 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> Hi >> >> Can anybody explain what the reasons, politics and consequences of >> adding RFC into patch header in this mailing list? I think, it is not >> worth to add this information to >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch > Peter's response was great, but this page is a wiki. Would you like to > add the information yourself, now that you have it? > done. -- Best regards, Vladimir