diff for duplicates of <54E613E7.2020405@gmail.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 6c63b44..c61b8fc 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> the FW/bootloader could be common even if the DTB couldn't. >> >> To some extent there must be a DTB that will work across all variants ->> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work? +>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work… >> > -> That?s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common +> That’s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common > is the model property that would allow the quirk detection logic to fire. > > So, there is a base DTB that will work on all variants, but that only means @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >>>> appended DTB if it's not possible to update the board configuration. >>>> >>> ->>> You?re missing the point. I can?t use the same DTB for each revision of the ->>> board. Each board is similar but it?s not identical. +>>> You’re missing the point. I can’t use the same DTB for each revision of the +>>> board. Each board is similar but it’s not identical. >> >> I think you've misunderstood my point. If you program the board with the >> relevant DTB, or use appended DTB, then you will pass the correct DTB to @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > > In theory it might work, in practice this does not. Ludovic mentioned that they > have 27 different DTBs in use at the moment. At a relatively common 60k per DTB -> that?s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed. +> that’s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed. < snip > diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 58a3967..1607aa1 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,10 +4,22 @@ "ref\0FE61DD1C-51DA-4869-8A62-C019C3D70577@konsulko.com\0" "ref\020150218173115.GG29429@leverpostej\0" "ref\076BD1B22-BAED-4205-9B34-186907CE0217@konsulko.com\0" - "From\0frowand.list@gmail.com (Frank Rowand)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0" + "From\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0" "Date\0Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:48:39 -0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>\0" + "Cc\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>" + devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> + Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> + Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> + Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> + Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org> + Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> + " frowand.list@gmail.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 2/19/2015 6:29 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:\n" @@ -34,10 +46,10 @@ ">> the FW/bootloader could be common even if the DTB couldn't.\n" ">>\n" ">> To some extent there must be a DTB that will work across all variants\n" - ">> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work?\n" + ">> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work\342\200\246\n" ">>\n" "> \n" - "> That?s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common\n" + "> That\342\200\231s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common\n" "> is the model property that would allow the quirk detection logic to fire.\n" "> \n" "> So, there is a base DTB that will work on all variants, but that only means\n" @@ -66,8 +78,8 @@ ">>>> appended DTB if it's not possible to update the board configuration.\n" ">>>>\n" ">>>\n" - ">>> You?re missing the point. I can?t use the same DTB for each revision of the\n" - ">>> board. Each board is similar but it?s not identical.\n" + ">>> You\342\200\231re missing the point. I can\342\200\231t use the same DTB for each revision of the\n" + ">>> board. Each board is similar but it\342\200\231s not identical.\n" ">>\n" ">> I think you've misunderstood my point. If you program the board with the\n" ">> relevant DTB, or use appended DTB, then you will pass the correct DTB to\n" @@ -78,7 +90,7 @@ "> \n" "> In theory it might work, in practice this does not. Ludovic mentioned that they\n" "> have 27 different DTBs in use at the moment. At a relatively common 60k per DTB\n" - "> that?s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.\n" + "> that\342\200\231s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.\n" "\n" "< snip >\n" "\n" @@ -92,4 +104,4 @@ "\n" -Frank -fce228273b56b740e400eb2106a62131545e171566fd21c9e9a4a2ca259ff3f5 +15807a54b12e783c40110c2c9f64aa3dbfba2a8205f7339eca278bb90186e601
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.