diff for duplicates of <54E61484.1060209@gmail.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 39bcabb..c0685ec 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ On 2/19/2015 8:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 2/19/2015 6:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi Frank, >> ->>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote: +>>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >>>> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence. @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ On 2/19/2015 8:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>> the ripple effects this conceptual change implies. >>> >> ->> I don?t see what the big problem with the validator is. The ?quirk? +>> I don’t see what the big problem with the validator is. The ‘quirk’ >> are easily identified by the presence of the __overlay__ nodes and >> the validator can apply each overlay and perform the validation check >> at each resultant tree. @@ -105,7 +105,12 @@ oops: there will be ripples from this proposal. >> >> Regards >> ->> ? Pantelis +>> — Pantelis >> >> -> +> + +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in +the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 81a623c..a7993d2 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,17 +3,28 @@ "ref\054E54586.5070602@gmail.com\0" "ref\023825C6A-7FF1-4D06-8802-F6964F71B97C@konsulko.com\0" "ref\054E61200.4010002@gmail.com\0" - "From\0frowand.list@gmail.com (Frank Rowand)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0" + "ref\054E61200.4010002-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0" "Date\0Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:51:16 -0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "Cc\0Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>" + Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org> + devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> + Koen Kooi <koen-QLwJDigV5abLmq1fohREcCpxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> + Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> + linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> + linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org + Matt Porter <matt.porter-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> + " Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 2/19/2015 8:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" "> On 2/19/2015 6:41 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:\n" ">> Hi Frank,\n" ">>\n" - ">>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:\n" + ">>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 04:08 , Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" ">>>\n" ">>> On 2/18/2015 6:59 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:\n" ">>>> Implement a method of applying DT quirks early in the boot sequence.\n" @@ -70,7 +81,7 @@ ">>> the ripple effects this conceptual change implies.\n" ">>>\n" ">>\n" - ">> I don?t see what the big problem with the validator is. The ?quirk?\n" + ">> I don\342\200\231t see what the big problem with the validator is. The \342\200\230quirk\342\200\231\n" ">> are easily identified by the presence of the __overlay__ nodes and\n" ">> the validator can apply each overlay and perform the validation check \n" ">> at each resultant tree.\n" @@ -116,9 +127,14 @@ ">>\n" ">> Regards\n" ">>\n" - ">> ? Pantelis\n" + ">> \342\200\224 Pantelis\n" ">>\n" ">>\n" - > + "> \n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe devicetree\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -4ceda1c2863cb9f64f05a02ab4af11af599433a59793a66dea58b57d10515ee3 +14e6e6ce87d1d3ced23bb64d441695fc20baa9bbfa7ae8d73f6519a99881556b
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 39bcabb..3d2e698 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ On 2/19/2015 8:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>> the ripple effects this conceptual change implies. >>> >> ->> I don?t see what the big problem with the validator is. The ?quirk? +>> I don’t see what the big problem with the validator is. The ‘quirk’ >> are easily identified by the presence of the __overlay__ nodes and >> the validator can apply each overlay and perform the validation check >> at each resultant tree. @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ oops: there will be ripples from this proposal. >> >> Regards >> ->> ? Pantelis +>> — Pantelis >> >> > diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 81a623c..8ba4cd8 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,10 +3,21 @@ "ref\054E54586.5070602@gmail.com\0" "ref\023825C6A-7FF1-4D06-8802-F6964F71B97C@konsulko.com\0" "ref\054E61200.4010002@gmail.com\0" - "From\0frowand.list@gmail.com (Frank Rowand)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0" + "From\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0" "Date\0Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:51:16 -0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)\0" + "Cc\0Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>" + Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> + devicetree@vger.kernel.org + Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> + Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> + Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org> + " Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 2/19/2015 8:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:\n" @@ -70,7 +81,7 @@ ">>> the ripple effects this conceptual change implies.\n" ">>>\n" ">>\n" - ">> I don?t see what the big problem with the validator is. The ?quirk?\n" + ">> I don\342\200\231t see what the big problem with the validator is. The \342\200\230quirk\342\200\231\n" ">> are easily identified by the presence of the __overlay__ nodes and\n" ">> the validator can apply each overlay and perform the validation check \n" ">> at each resultant tree.\n" @@ -116,9 +127,9 @@ ">>\n" ">> Regards\n" ">>\n" - ">> ? Pantelis\n" + ">> \342\200\224 Pantelis\n" ">>\n" ">>\n" > -4ceda1c2863cb9f64f05a02ab4af11af599433a59793a66dea58b57d10515ee3 +682b86dfc8dc716066e3736f88730971c5accfb1887a246e1fc8a91729ec87ab
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.