All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <54E61DD2.3060002@gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 81fa235..d40c28c 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
 >>>> the FW/bootloader could be common even if the DTB couldn't.
 >>>>
 >>>> To some extent there must be a DTB that will work across all variants
->>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work?
+>>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work…
 >>>>
 >>>
->>> That?s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common
+>>> That’s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common
 >>> is the model property that would allow the quirk detection logic to fire.
 >>>
 >>> So, there is a base DTB that will work on all variants, but that only means
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
 >>>>>> appended DTB if it's not possible to update the board configuration.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>
->>>>> You?re missing the point. I can?t use the same DTB for each revision of the
->>>>> board. Each board is similar but it?s not identical.
+>>>>> You’re missing the point. I can’t use the same DTB for each revision of the
+>>>>> board. Each board is similar but it’s not identical.
 >>>>
 >>>> I think you've misunderstood my point. If you program the board with the
 >>>> relevant DTB, or use appended DTB, then you will pass the correct DTB to
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
 >>>
 >>> In theory it might work, in practice this does not. Ludovic mentioned that they
 >>> have 27 different DTBs in use at the moment. At a relatively common 60k per DTB
->>> that?s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.
+>>> that’s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.
 >>
 >> < snip >
 >>
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
 > 
 > Trust no-one.
 > 
-> This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn?t understand which makes people
+> This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn’t understand which makes people
 > who push product quite mad.
 > 
 > Engineering a product is not only about meeting customer spec, in order to turn a profit
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
 > 
 > Yes, you can always manually install files in the bootloader. For 1 board no problem.
 > For 10 doable. For 100 I guess you can hire an extra guy. For 1 million? Guess what,
-> instead of turning a profit you?re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit
+> instead of turning a profit you’re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit
 > per unit.
 
 I'm not installing physical components manually.  Why would I be installing software
@@ -107,16 +107,16 @@ manually?  (rhetorical question)
 And you produce a few million units before testing that the first one off the line works?
 
 > 
-> And frankly I don?t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support
-> they have you?d be amazed.
+> And frankly I don’t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support
+> they have you’d be amazed.
 > 
-> I would be very surprised if there?s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.
+> I would be very surprised if there’s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.
 >  
 >> -Frank
 > 
 > Regards
 > 
-> ? Pantelis
+> — Pantelis
 > 
 > PS. For a real use case please take a look at the answer Guenter gave on this thread a little
 > while back.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 620cc21..33b11b2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,10 +6,21 @@
  "ref\076BD1B22-BAED-4205-9B34-186907CE0217@konsulko.com\0"
  "ref\054E613E7.2020405@gmail.com\0"
  "ref\0670D0881-DBF0-45E8-A502-A6DB2B77A750@konsulko.com\0"
- "From\0frowand.list@gmail.com (Frank Rowand)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0"
+ "From\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:30:58 -0800\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>"
+  devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
+  Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
+  Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
+  Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+  Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
+  Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+  Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>
+ " Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 2/19/2015 9:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:\n"
@@ -41,10 +52,10 @@
  ">>>> the FW/bootloader could be common even if the DTB couldn't.\n"
  ">>>>\n"
  ">>>> To some extent there must be a DTB that will work across all variants\n"
- ">>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work?\n"
+ ">>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work\342\200\246\n"
  ">>>>\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> That?s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common\n"
+ ">>> That\342\200\231s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common\n"
  ">>> is the model property that would allow the quirk detection logic to fire.\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">>> So, there is a base DTB that will work on all variants, but that only means\n"
@@ -73,8 +84,8 @@
  ">>>>>> appended DTB if it's not possible to update the board configuration.\n"
  ">>>>>>\n"
  ">>>>>\n"
- ">>>>> You?re missing the point. I can?t use the same DTB for each revision of the\n"
- ">>>>> board. Each board is similar but it?s not identical.\n"
+ ">>>>> You\342\200\231re missing the point. I can\342\200\231t use the same DTB for each revision of the\n"
+ ">>>>> board. Each board is similar but it\342\200\231s not identical.\n"
  ">>>>\n"
  ">>>> I think you've misunderstood my point. If you program the board with the\n"
  ">>>> relevant DTB, or use appended DTB, then you will pass the correct DTB to\n"
@@ -85,7 +96,7 @@
  ">>>\n"
  ">>> In theory it might work, in practice this does not. Ludovic mentioned that they\n"
  ">>> have 27 different DTBs in use at the moment. At a relatively common 60k per DTB\n"
- ">>> that?s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.\n"
+ ">>> that\342\200\231s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> < snip >\n"
  ">>\n"
@@ -100,7 +111,7 @@
  "> \n"
  "> Trust no-one.\n"
  "> \n"
- "> This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn?t understand which makes people\n"
+ "> This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn\342\200\231t understand which makes people\n"
  "> who push product quite mad.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Engineering a product is not only about meeting customer spec, in order to turn a profit\n"
@@ -108,7 +119,7 @@
  "> \n"
  "> Yes, you can always manually install files in the bootloader. For 1 board no problem.\n"
  "> For 10 doable. For 100 I guess you can hire an extra guy. For 1 million? Guess what,\n"
- "> instead of turning a profit you?re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit\n"
+ "> instead of turning a profit you\342\200\231re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit\n"
  "> per unit.\n"
  "\n"
  "I'm not installing physical components manually.  Why would I be installing software\n"
@@ -121,16 +132,16 @@
  "And you produce a few million units before testing that the first one off the line works?\n"
  "\n"
  "> \n"
- "> And frankly I don?t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support\n"
- "> they have you?d be amazed.\n"
+ "> And frankly I don\342\200\231t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support\n"
+ "> they have you\342\200\231d be amazed.\n"
  "> \n"
- "> I would be very surprised if there?s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.\n"
+ "> I would be very surprised if there\342\200\231s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.\n"
  ">  \n"
  ">> -Frank\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Regards\n"
  "> \n"
- "> ? Pantelis\n"
+ "> \342\200\224 Pantelis\n"
  "> \n"
  "> PS. For a real use case please take a look at the answer Guenter gave on this thread a little\n"
  "> while back.\n"
@@ -140,4 +151,4 @@
  "\n"
  -Frank
 
-728b5f2069f7d1a1324531af2625b80a1ed9c780a37bad9292cf37f9af732471
+109dfe9520f54a052980648f09dae8af778d135a50c4abd400a0f4a06e247fa3

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.