From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YOYnt-0004IG-8F for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:38:37 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (unknown [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D0BD40EA44 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:38:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54E657C0.6080402@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:38:08 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Sending frames on monitor interface? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k Do any of the firmware versions support sending (raw) frames on the monitor interface? It seems 10.1 just asserts if someone tries this. I can fix at least some of this, but firmware seems to want a peer in order to transmit any packets...maybe adding self-peer to the monitor interface is a way to get around this? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k