From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/3] XEN ARM PCI support
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:12:54 +0000
Message-ID: <54E724C6.1020000@linaro.org>
References: <54E71EEF.30506@caviumnetworks.com>	<54E72E620200007800061F4A@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<54E722ED.50807@caviumnetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <54E722ED.50807@caviumnetworks.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@gmail.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 20/02/15 12:05, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> On 20/02/15 5:23 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> All of these #ifdef-s call for better abstraction. And in no case is it
>> acceptable to replace blank lines with #ifdef-s like you do.
> Good observation. I will take care for the blank lines.
> A lot of code existed in generic files specific to x86, so arm specific
> defines.

Some of us have filter to get quickly mail where we are CCed.

So please reply to all rather than only the mailing list.

Thanks,

-- 
Julien Grall