From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:55:00 +0000 Message-ID: <54E73CB4.7000007@citrix.com> References: <1423720996-3332-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <54DC8974.5060908@citrix.com> <54E2F040.5020807@suse.com> <54E4635B.5000906@citrix.com> <54E46594.7000206@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YOo37-0003SK-2V for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:55:21 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54E46594.7000206@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Juergen Gross , David Vrabel , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Boris Ostrovsky List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 18/02/15 10:12, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> >>> If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build >>> enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other >>> files in arch/x86/xen. >> >> Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes? I don't really like >> scope-creep in patch series. > > Are you sure this is possible? XEN will be configured in more cases as > today: this is the result of being able to build pv-drivers for hvm > domains. I mean there should be the minimum set of changes need for the Kconfig refactor to work, but any additional improvements to the build etc. should be via a different series. David