From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752205AbbBWHbz (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:31:55 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:42088 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbbBWHby (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:31:54 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,629,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="689293471" Message-ID: <54EAD6DF.1000709@intel.com> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:29:35 +0200 From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Ahern CC: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Stephane Eranian , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Pawel Moll , Steven Rostedt , Andi Kleen , Mathieu Poirier Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] perf: Sample additional clock value References: <1424436249-3572-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <1424436249-3572-2-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <54E769A4.2090502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54E769A4.2090502@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/02/15 19:06, David Ahern wrote: > On 2/20/15 5:44 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h >> index efe2d2d..9385140 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h >> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h >> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ extern void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu *pmu, >> int src_cpu, int dst_cpu); >> extern u64 perf_event_read_value(struct perf_event *event, >> u64 *enabled, u64 *running); >> - >> +u64 perf_sample_clock_pt(void); > > Core functions should not be arch specific. PT == x86. Actually it was one of the ARM guys that asked for it to be called "Processor Trace". It was "arch" in V1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142436891806015 But it has been superseded completely by patches from Peter, so it is not going further anyway.