From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mk: Work around Debian/Ubuntu-specific 'gcc
 -dumpversion' output
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:14:40 +0100
Message-ID: <54EC5D20.9090807@6wind.com>
References: <7529e243896615deb7d93e6080dfd2aced92bf86.1424774816.git.pmatilai@redhat.com>
 <CALwxeUuEzJhxksjUuCNjDvpW=Z3BUb9Ac6H=GemeWKW+VVhP7w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" <dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALwxeUuEzJhxksjUuCNjDvpW=Z3BUb9Ac6H=GemeWKW+VVhP7w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

Hi Panu, David,

On 02/24/2015 11:59 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>> >Commit 71f0ab1849b4fc3ca928deb566df12ca725ed150 broke compilation
>> >on some versions of Debian and Ubuntu where gcc has been modified
>> >to only emit MAJOR.MINOR part of the version from 'gcc -dumpversion'.
>> >Drop the micro-version from gcc version comparisons to work around
>> >this, it wasn't being used for anything anyway.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen<pmatilai-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> ack (and works with my debian gcc).
>

One question: will it work with a version like with 2 digits
for major or minor like 4.10.0 or 10.0.0?
(or maybe it cannot happen with gcc naming conventions?)

Thanks,
Olivier