From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laszlo Ersek Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/29] Xen/ARM guest support Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:41:43 +0100 Message-ID: <54ECC5E7.9030201@redhat.com> References: <1424800990-15777-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <54ECC426.2040208@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Julien Grall , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Olivier Martin , Stefano Stabellini , Jordan Justen , "edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , Leif Lindholm , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Roy Franz , "Kinney, Michael D" , Anthony PERARD List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/24/15 19:37, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 24 February 2015 at 18:34, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 02/24/15 19:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >>> Changes since v4: >>> - rename InterlockedCompareExchange16 () patch as suggested by Jordan, and added >>> his ack >>> - fix a bug spotted by Anthony in the TestAndClearBit () implementation >>> - added more acks and R-b's >> >> - Are there any patches missing review tags? > > There is just one patch, #23, which had a bug so I was hoping Anthony > would add his R-b to the now fixed version. > The InterlockedCompareExchange16() has Jordan's ack, but no reply yet > from Michael Kinney. > >> - Who should push this once everything is reviewed? >> > > Good question. Are you volunteering? :-) Yes. Kick me when you have a public branch with the final review tags added. Thanks Laszlo