From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Hubbard Subject: Re: Tool for ceph performance analysis Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:31:34 +1000 Message-ID: <54ED3406.400@redhat.com> References: <54EC6714.3090604@redhat.com> <54EC6BA9.3070405@redhat.com> <54EC8758.6050405@redhat.com> <54ED2944.60508@redhat.com> <54ED29F6.1040300@redhat.com> <54ED2BB5.60304@redhat.com> Reply-To: bhubbard@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42531 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753069AbbBYCbh (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:31:37 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1P2Vbea032545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:31:37 -0500 Received: from dhcp-1-109.bne.redhat.com (vpn1-51-112.bne.redhat.com [10.64.51.112]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1P2VZ6b010047 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:31:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54ED2BB5.60304@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On 02/25/2015 11:56 AM, Brad Hubbard wrote: > Right, and let each solution stand on it's merits. Ugh! *its* -- Kindest Regards, Brad Hubbard Senior Software Maintenance Engineer Red Hat Global Support Services Asia Pacific Region