From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53159)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1YQYqJ-0004OZ-Hf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:05:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1YQYqD-0000EX-0N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:05:23 -0500
Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=17055 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1YQYqC-0000E1-JG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:05:16 -0500
Message-ID: <54ED9CC4.90102@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:58:28 +0800
From: Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1423821709.git.zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<54EBD30C.1040902@cn.fujitsu.com> <54ECAD4D.9030506@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <54ECAD4D.9030506@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] cpu: add device_add
	foo-x86_64-cpu support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, anshul.makkar@profitbricks.com, imammedo@redhat.com

Hi Andreas,

On 02/25/2015 12:56 AM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
> Hi Gu,
>
> Am 24.02.2015 um 02:25 schrieb Gu Zheng:
>> The issues you commented in the previous version have been fixed in this=
 one.
> What I have repeatedly rejected is "device_add foo-x86_64-cpu". This is
> still in 00/10 and 09/10. Most of the actual changes however do look to
> be going in the right direction of making 'realize' work as expected for
> foo-x86_64-cpu.
>
> As for the socket-based device_add I mentioned, I had pushed a work
> branch qom-cpu-x86 and had some off-list discussions for some of the
> other architectures but did not submit it as an RFC yet. What I am still
> working on is dynamic properties to allocate cores (threads TBD) for
> "device_add x86_64-cpu-socket,cores=3Dn".
Can you explain all your thoughts about cpu hotplug feature with=20
socket-based,
or how goals do you want to see?

and what is the status of "device_add x86_64-cpu-socket" ?

after that, I think we can do somethings to help you to achieve your ideas.

Thanks,
Chen

>
>> Could you please help to review it?
> Will get to it Friday earliest.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>