From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YQgdY-0003qG-V8 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:24:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (unknown [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49491409E87 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:24:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54EE1355.3010306@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:24:21 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Question on setting tx-power in ath10k. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k I have added some debugging in my CT firmware based on 10.1.467, and I have noticed that anything below 5db is treated as zero by the firmware. This is due primarily to subtracting a fixed amount based on the NIC's configured chainmask. I am guessing this is not entirely correct, since at /b rates, for instance, we will be transmitting on only a single chain, so it does not matter how many chains the hardware has? Anyone have any insight on how this stuff is *supposed* to work? If you have access to firmware source, plz contact me off the mailing list and I can provide more details about the code that looks broken. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k