From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:37456 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752984AbbBYU7I (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:59:08 -0500 Message-ID: <54EE3796.9010306@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:59:02 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Baluta , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" CC: bogdan.m.davidoaia@intel.com, antonel.g.dobre@intel.com, alin.g.arhip@intel.com, Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: Re: Linux IIO test framework References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 25/02/15 13:38, Daniel Baluta wrote: > Hello, > > We are analyzing the possibility of writing a Linux IIO test framework. cool > > First, we need to know if there is already any work done in this > area. Didn't find anything on the Internet :). Not that I know of, but if anyone is going to have such tests (or know of them) my guess is Lars... > > Second, do you think that this would bring any benefit to the Linux kernel > IIO subsystem? Definitely has potential. Do you have some examples of particular tests in mind? > > We would like to keep the tests in kernel tree under (tools/testing/selftests) > and I'm not yet sure if we can make use of libiio [1]. Sounds sensible to me. > > Because we are now gathering requirements for this, any feedback would > be more than welcomed. > > thanks, > Daniel. > > [1] https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/libiio >