Re: [ceph-users] who is using radosgw with civetweb?

[Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>]

On 26/02/15 11:50, Tom Deneau wrote:
> Sage Weil <sweil <at> redhat.com> writes:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>>> We tried to get radosgw working with Apache + mod_fastcgi, but due to
>>> the changes in radosgw, Apache, mode_*cgi, etc and the documentation
>>> lagging and not having a lot of time to devote to it, we abandoned it.
>>> Where it the documentation for civetweb? If it is appliance like and
>>> easy to set-up, we would like to try it to offer some feedback on your
>>> question.
>>
>> In giant and hammer, it is enabled by default on port 7480.  On firefly,
>> you need to add the line
>>
>>   rgw frontends = fastcgi, civetweb port=7480
>>
>> to ceph.conf (you can of course adjust the port number if you like) and
>> radosgw will run standalone w/ no apache or anything else.
>>
>> sage
>>
>
> Like Robert, I have had trouble getting the gateway working with the Apache
> methods.  So civetweb is something we would like to try.
>
> I am running 0.92 built from sources using rpmbuild.  (This is on arm64).
> So I assume I do not need any rgw frontends line in ceph.conf.
>
> It would be good to document what steps from
> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/config/ are still required when
> using civetweb.
>

+1. I was considering using civetweb whilst experimenting with radosgw - 
and didn't because I had no idea how to get it going. It is funny that I 
probably had it running anyway (0.92), but highlights the importance of 
having the docs up to date!

Cheers

Mark