Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix a precedence bug

[Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>]

Hi,

(2015/02/27 18:35), He Kuang wrote:
> The minus operator has higher precedence than ?:
> Add parentheses around ?: fix this.

Thank you for fixing that,

Could you give us an actual example of the result?
e.g. What happened? and how to reproduce it?

Thank you,

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> index 919937e..bed8d0f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static u64 kernel_get_symbol_address_by_name(const char *name, bool reloc)
>  		sym = __find_kernel_function_by_name(name, &map);
>  		if (sym)
>  			return map->unmap_ip(map, sym->start) -
> -				(reloc) ? 0 : map->reloc;
> +				((reloc) ? 0 : map->reloc);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com