From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/24] xen/arm: Allow virq != irq
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:25:46 +0000
Message-ID: <54F07E6A.3080500@linaro.org>
References: <1421159133-31526-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>	
	<1421159133-31526-9-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>
	<1424447564.30924.322.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <julien.grall@linaro.org>) id 1YRLrt-0001xh-HI
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:26:17 +0000
Received: by wggx12 with SMTP id x12so20722692wgg.11
	for <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>;
	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:26:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1424447564.30924.322.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi Ian,

On 20/02/15 15:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> As DOM0 will get most the devices, the vIRQ is equal to the IRQ in that case.
> 
> Am I correct that after this patch all callers still pass irq==virq to
> the new function?

Sorry, I forgot to answer to this question. Yes, all the callers will
pass irq == virq in case of DOM0.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall