From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRM9M-0004bf-6c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:44:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRM9H-0008G7-53 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:44:20 -0500 Message-ID: <54F082BC.2040407@suse.de> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:44:12 +0100 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1423521652-14890-1-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> <54F06C7A.5090009@ilande.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <54F06C7A.5090009@ilande.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 0/9] ppc: loadvm/savevm fixups for -M g3beige and -M mac99 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org On 27.02.15 14:09, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 09/02/15 22:40, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > >> This patchset fixes up various bugs in loadvm/savevm for -M g3beige and >> -M mac99 so that it is becomes possible to save and restore image snapshots. >> >> The focus of this patchset is on -M g3beige since this matches the majority >> of my test images, but there were some easy fixes to be made to -M mac99 >> at the same time. >> >> With this patchset applied both -M g3beige and -M mac99 images can be >> saved/restored whilst booted into OpenBIOS with no issues. I tested -M g3beige >> with a paused, disk-inactive Darwin 6 image and was able to resume >> successfully which was good enough for my needs. >> >> I noticed some hangs can still occur when trying to restore an image >> where the disk is active which makes me believe that there is still some >> extra macio/dbdma state which needs to be included if someone is interested >> enough to pursue this further. >> >> Most of the patches are straightforward except for patch 4 which came out of >> a discussion on-list between Alex and Paolo, and patch 5 which is a similar >> error except this time for the MSR register. > > Ping? Just saw the other openpic patches go through the list and was > wondering if this patchset needed any further work? Sorry, LIFO for patch / mail queues probably just isn't the best way to handle them ;). Applied to ppc-next now, thanks a lot for your work! Alex