From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] locking: ww_mutex: add one level of indirection for access of the lock
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:57:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F0BE02.1090100@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F0B581.1070908@canonical.com>
On 02/27/2015 07:20 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Assuming it's compile tested, can't really test that here. :)
It passes the self-test without the killable one and the other one I
switched off. And that thing that we have in -RT has been reported to
be working with the nouveau driver.
There is the Kconfig switch which would enable it so you could use it.
Not sure if we should keep that way or hide it better :)
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Thanks.
> I can't review the second or third patch, I don't understand rt mutexes well enough.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 16:57 rt_mutex based ww_mutex implementation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-27 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] locking: ww_mutex: add one level of indirection for access of the lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-27 18:20 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-02-27 18:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2015-02-27 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] locking: ww_mutex: Allow to use rt_mutex instead of mutex for the baselock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-02 3:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-02 8:46 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-03-02 12:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-06 12:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-06 12:16 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-03-06 12:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-06 17:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-09 10:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-09 10:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-09 11:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-09 11:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-03-09 13:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-09 22:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-10 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-10 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-10 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-10 14:10 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-03-10 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-10 18:21 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-03-10 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-10 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-27 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] locking: rtmutex: set state back to running on error Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-28 10:00 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/rtmutex: Set " tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-01 5:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] locking: rtmutex: set " Mike Galbraith
2015-03-01 8:48 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/rtmutex: Set " tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F0BE02.1090100@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.