From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:04:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:48836 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27007622AbbB0TE4EfikO (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:04:56 +0100 Received: from KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (unknown [192.168.5.35]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id E8AFF13BEE510; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BAMAIL02.ba.imgtec.org (10.20.40.28) by KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (192.168.5.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:04:50 +0000 Received: from [10.20.78.189] (10.20.78.189) by bamail02.ba.imgtec.org (10.20.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:04:48 -0800 Message-ID: <54F0BFD0.2050901@imgtec.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:04:48 -0600 From: "Steven J. Hill" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Daney CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] MIPS: Rearrange PTE bits into fixed positions. References: <1424996199-21366-1-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> <1424996199-21366-2-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> <54EFBF9D.4020004@gmail.com> <54EFE6B9.1050109@imgtec.com> <54F0AECF.5070501@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54F0AECF.5070501@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.20.78.189] Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 46050 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: Steven.Hill@imgtec.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 02/27/2015 11:52 AM, David Daney wrote: > > I think there is still misunderstanding. > > Your patches leave us with definitions for *both* _PAGE_READ *and* > _PAGE_NO_READ defined in the source code. My suggestion was to > eliminate all vestiges of _PAGE_READ and _PAGE_READ_SHIFT, and unify > all variants to use _PAGE_NO_READ > Okay, I see what you are after. I think it is worth doing, but I would really like to get XPA into 4.0 along with this patch as it is. I will commit to doing a follow up patch for the above. Is that acceptable? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:48836 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27007622AbbB0TE4EfikO (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:04:56 +0100 Message-ID: <54F0BFD0.2050901@imgtec.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:04:48 -0600 From: "Steven J. Hill" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] MIPS: Rearrange PTE bits into fixed positions. References: <1424996199-21366-1-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> <1424996199-21366-2-git-send-email-Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> <54EFBF9D.4020004@gmail.com> <54EFE6B9.1050109@imgtec.com> <54F0AECF.5070501@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54F0AECF.5070501@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: David Daney Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20150227190448.nbUBLt7ggDFek0PJR0-ODA9Bml6XbqEYuEIIslkVDgE@z> On 02/27/2015 11:52 AM, David Daney wrote: > > I think there is still misunderstanding. > > Your patches leave us with definitions for *both* _PAGE_READ *and* > _PAGE_NO_READ defined in the source code. My suggestion was to > eliminate all vestiges of _PAGE_READ and _PAGE_READ_SHIFT, and unify > all variants to use _PAGE_NO_READ > Okay, I see what you are after. I think it is worth doing, but I would really like to get XPA into 4.0 along with this patch as it is. I will commit to doing a follow up patch for the above. Is that acceptable?