From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51143) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRRPf-0006pX-Cm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:21:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRRPb-0002bJ-9X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:21:31 -0500 Received: from [2a03:4000:1::4e2f:c7ac:d] (port=38046 helo=v220110690675601.yourvserver.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRRPb-0002b9-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:21:27 -0500 Message-ID: <54F0D1BB.8090703@weilnetz.de> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:21:15 +0100 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1425045947-9271-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <20150227165723.GB32542@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <54F0A86E.7000608@weilnetz.de> <54F0A957.5090906@redhat.com> <54F0B26E.2020000@weilnetz.de> <54F0B2E5.9020800@redhat.com> <54F0B38C.80908@weilnetz.de> <54F0B449.1050106@redhat.com> <54F0BD84.2060606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54F0BD84.2060606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block/vdi: Add locking for parallel requests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org Am 27.02.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Max Reitz: > On 2015-02-27 at 13:15, Max Reitz wrote: >> On 2015-02-27 at 13:12, Stefan Weil wrote: >>> Am 27.02.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Max Reitz: >>>> It always fails for me. Do you have an SSD? >>> On the real machine: yes. On the virtual machine: maybe. >> >> I don't, so maybe that's the issue. But running it in tmpfs doesn't >> change anything for me, still fails (every time). > > And now it doesn't fail any more on my HDD (but still in tmpfs). Great. > > How about this test case (which is in line with what Paolo identified > is the potential problem)? :-) > > Max No failure with the new one, too. Stefan