From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47604)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1YRSie-0004yT-0m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:45:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1YRSid-0000Lr-83
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:45:11 -0500
Message-ID: <54F0E555.2020803@weilnetz.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:44:53 +0100
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1425045947-9271-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
	<54F0AC87.3040707@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <54F0AC87.3040707@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block/vdi: Add locking for parallel
	requests
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 27.02.2015 um 18:42 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
> An optimized fix could be to use a CoRwLock, then:


Note related to our previous discussion: why does the code use CoRwlock 
instead of CoRwLock? Should it be renamed before more code uses it?

Stefan