From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48061)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1YRSk6-0007OW-P9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:43 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1YRSjx-00017Y-Fy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:42 -0500
Message-ID: <54F0E5AC.3010407@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:46:20 -0500
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1425045947-9271-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
	<54F0AC87.3040707@redhat.com> <54F0E555.2020803@weilnetz.de>
In-Reply-To: <54F0E555.2020803@weilnetz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block/vdi: Add locking for parallel
	requests
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 2015-02-27 at 16:44, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 27.02.2015 um 18:42 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>
>> An optimized fix could be to use a CoRwLock, then:
>
>
> Note related to our previous discussion: why does the code use 
> CoRwlock instead of CoRwLock? Should it be renamed before more code 
> uses it?

Well, I'm simply not using it (in v3 at least...), so I hope I'll get 
away without touching that. :-)

Max