From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rgw and the next firefly release Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:44:07 +0100 Message-ID: <54F19BF7.6030808@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WkhvwhdUbRHl5bKlfnxBxx2XtBdgt2V7V" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:50483 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750835AbbB1KoN (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2015 05:44:13 -0500 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WkhvwhdUbRHl5bKlfnxBxx2XtBdgt2V7V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yehuda, The rados teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in https= ://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports came back green http://= pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-27_18:04:18-rgw-firefly-backports---basic-m= ulti/. Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testin= g ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --WkhvwhdUbRHl5bKlfnxBxx2XtBdgt2V7V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTxm/cACgkQ8dLMyEl6F215xACdGe44lfEMSdTR/Lty63WMapnv 684AoKRZeVPMDRBuZCa44ltCYj+WzSSi =z4vI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WkhvwhdUbRHl5bKlfnxBxx2XtBdgt2V7V--