From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rados and the next firefly release Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 16:42:53 +0100 Message-ID: <54F1E1FD.7060206@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qsIVcCNsIaa50VEaTxr3L0vm9RJ2TcEmw" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:50590 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbbB1Pm4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:42:56 -0500 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qsIVcCNsIaa50VEaTxr3L0vm9RJ2TcEmw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sam, The rados teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in https= ://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports came back with one fail= ure (unreadable crash from ceph-osd http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10485)= =2E The details of the run is at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641#rad= os (note that one run was solely to repeat the jobs that failed because o= f environmental problems). Do you think it is ready for QE to start their= own round of testing ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --qsIVcCNsIaa50VEaTxr3L0vm9RJ2TcEmw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTx4f0ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22/XwCfYW80WiN059eI/JqnWrqikrqB XYoAnRse0dRcqpIDkRv8RlPTuVzQiEHw =QUGE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qsIVcCNsIaa50VEaTxr3L0vm9RJ2TcEmw--