Re: rgw and the next firefly release

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1742 bytes --]

Hi Yehuda,

Thanks for the quick feedback, much appreciated :-) Let me know as soon as these fixes are committed to master. If you think the cherry-pick is straightforward, I'll take care of it.

Cheers

On 28/02/2015 17:55, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh" <yehuda@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 2:44:07 AM
>> Subject: rgw and the next firefly release
>>
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The rados teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports came back green
>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-27_18:04:18-rgw-firefly-backports---basic-multi/.
>> Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
> 
> I think the following issues need to get in:
>  - 10978 (fix still hasn't made it upstream, current commit: b6e43e30b39aed701bb4cdfaa0f6b27c1f207d86)
>  - 10965 (fix still hasn't made it upstream, current commits: f28fe744285117a1715eac0d08911cdb37285103, caa90225bad9fe5e9c275e6189b3396b4d396e3f)
>  - 10907 (commit: 986d7554426764a149621ba733c5c075b94e0431)
> 
> 
> I prepared the top two branches, need to do a sanity check on them first, then I'll send a pull request to master. I think 10978 is critical, the bottom two are important for civetweb and less risky.
> 
> Yehuda
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]