From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: rbd and the next firefly release Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 00:30:28 +0100 Message-ID: <54F24F94.2020402@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tCpRamcX1OJJppbgwmNcN7PM1DGIbLDPQ" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:50752 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751937AbbB1Xac (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:30:32 -0500 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Josh Durgin Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tCpRamcX1OJJppbgwmNcN7PM1DGIbLDPQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Josh, The rbd teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in https:/= /github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports is green. The details of = the run is at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641#rbd. Note that today's= run were to repeat the jobs that failed because of environmental problem= s (i.e. problems that were fixed by fixing the test suite itself, not by = adding a patch to Ceph). Do you think it is ready for QE to start their o= wn round of testing ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --tCpRamcX1OJJppbgwmNcN7PM1DGIbLDPQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTyT5QACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23XtACfbBeNngnrz0J+edOpTjixx+0j Ys8AoLuyHJA329gF6bqgWShWUx2PWnTS =BWWP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tCpRamcX1OJJppbgwmNcN7PM1DGIbLDPQ--