From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rgw and the next firefly release Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:44:22 +0100 Message-ID: <54F49366.9080203@dachary.org> References: <54F19BF7.6030808@dachary.org> <1610756257.12816609.1425142542413.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1845838520.13663626.1425312514641.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="msIl8FUaEDa9SBcXf8h7F0meUGD3H2hHK" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:51523 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754349AbbCBQo0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:44:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1845838520.13663626.1425312514641.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --msIl8FUaEDa9SBcXf8h7F0meUGD3H2hHK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yehuda, On 02/03/2015 17:08, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" >> To: "Loic Dachary" >> Cc: "Ceph Development" >> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 8:55:42 AM >> Subject: Re: rgw and the next firefly release >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Loic Dachary" >>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh" >>> Cc: "Ceph Development" >>> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 2:44:07 AM >>> Subject: rgw and the next firefly release >>> >>> Hi Yehuda, >>> >>> The rados teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports came back gree= n >>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-27_18:04:18-rgw-firefly-backport= s---basic-multi/. >>> Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?= >>> >>> Cheers >> >> I think the following issues need to get in: >> - 10978 (fix still hasn't made it upstream, current commit: >> b6e43e30b39aed701bb4cdfaa0f6b27c1f207d86) > it's actually eb13f2d4b60c031f16139f7cc4237c012644dd78. Sent pull reque= st #3843. Would you like me to cherry-pick this one to firefly and schedule a run o= f rgw suite with it ? https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3843 Cheers >=20 >> - 10965 (fix still hasn't made it upstream, current commits: >> f28fe744285117a1715eac0d08911cdb37285103, >> caa90225bad9fe5e9c275e6189b3396b4d396e3f) >> - 10907 (commit: 986d7554426764a149621ba733c5c075b94e0431) >> >> >> I prepared the top two branches, need to do a sanity check on them fir= st, >> then I'll send a pull request to master. I think 10978 is critical, th= e >> bottom two are important for civetweb and less risky. >> >> Yehuda >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" = in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --msIl8FUaEDa9SBcXf8h7F0meUGD3H2hHK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlT0k2YACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21UTwCeLzM3WFWWBVVinw7XZbruC7Ng ohcAn1oS4xS62ptw6mkyWsDGk3XWNpal =4buf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --msIl8FUaEDa9SBcXf8h7F0meUGD3H2hHK--