From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xen/arm: Do not allocate pte entries for MAP_SMALL_PAGES Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:17:39 +0000 Message-ID: <54F59853.4070109@linaro.org> References: <1424264213-30614-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <54E48DAB.5030307@linaro.org> <1424770282.27930.259.camel@citrix.com> <54EC4699.8050905@linaro.org> <1424773562.27930.301.camel@citrix.com> <54EC75C7.7040209@linaro.org> <1425378478.24959.71.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1425378478.24959.71.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Vijay Kilari Cc: Stefano Stabellini , Prasun Kapoor , Vijaya Kumar K , Tim Deegan , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Stefano Stabellini , manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Ian, On 03/03/2015 10:27, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:28 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >>> On 24/02/15 10:26, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 09:38 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >>>>> Hi Ian, >>>>> >>>>> On 24/02/2015 09:31, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 13:03 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >>>>>>>> + { >>>>>>>> + pte = mfn_to_xen_entry(mfn, (ai & 0xffff)); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please introduce a new macro for the mask. >>>>>> >>>>>> Better would be a pte_foo accessor, similar (if not identical) to x86's >>>>>> pte_get_flags. So pte_get_flags(ai) or so. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not able to find a such function in x86. Did you intend to mean >>>>> pte_flags_to_cacheattr? >>>> >>>> It's actually get_pte_flags. >>>> >>>>> In another side, using PTE_PRESENT would require to introduce a >>>>> PAGE_AVAIL0 (or smth similar). >>>> >>>> Why? >>> >>> If we have only a bit PTE_PRESENT, how do you define MAP_SMALL_PAGES? >> >> MAP_SMALL_PAGES is already defined as WRITE_ALLOC which occupies lower 3 bits >> what is need for PAGE_AVAIL0? >> >> Below definitions should suffice? > > I think so. You don't need the ()s around DEV_* and WRITE_ALLOC etc in > the PAGE_* definitions. I'm not sure to follow here. Do you think MAP_SMALL_PAGES should be defined as WRITE_ALLOC? > A comment on the format of the bit packing done here would also be > useful e.g. "16: present\n2:0: pte attributes field" in a little block > comment above this stuff, below the DEV_* stuff. > > PAGE_PRESENT might be more in keepign that PTE_PRESENT, since this isn't > a PTE bit pattern. Sounds good to me. Regards, -- Julien Grall