From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: omap-pcm: Correct dma mask Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:36:34 +0200 Message-ID: <54F5C6F2.60309@ti.com> References: <1425382694-30424-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20150303140848.GP21293@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A0426153F for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:36:40 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20150303140848.GP21293@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Jarkko Nikula List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Mark, On 03/03/2015 04:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:38:14PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> DMA_BIT_MASK of 64 is not valid dma address mask for OMAPs, it should be >> set to 32. >> The 64 was introduced by commit (in 2009): >> a152ff24b978 ASoC: OMAP: Make DMA 64 aligned > = > Applied, thanks. Would it be possible to add this tags to the patch, I forgot it: Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko Thanks, P=E9ter