From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] thermal: cpu_cooling: update the cpu device when cpufreq updates the policy cpu Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:33:43 +0000 Message-ID: <54F5D457.30706@arm.com> References: <1425316643-31991-1-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> <1425316643-31991-6-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> <54F5941F.6030402@arm.com> <54F59DEF.3020700@arm.com> <54F5CEBC.1070303@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Sudeep Holla , Kapileshwar Singh , Javi Merino , Eduardo Valentin , Zhang Rui , Linux PM list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Punit Agrawal , Lina Iyer , Mark Brown , Jon Medhurst List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 03/03/15 15:30, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 March 2015 at 20:56, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> You can use any_online_cpu(..) instead of cpumask_any IMO > > What about policy->cpu ? :) > We can, was not sure if they have access to policy in their thermal driver. Just the first thought seeing one line of the code posted :) Regards, Sudeep