From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:41:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F5D60F.9040602@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F5A165.4010408@arm.com>
On 03/03/2015 12:56 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/15 13:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sunday 25 January 2015 22:52:02 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 01/17/2015 10:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't
>>>> need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed
>>>> already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT.
>>>>
>>>> Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return
>>>> value
>>>> to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
>>>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>>>
>>> I would like to have an ack from Sudeep or Mark (Cc'ed) before taking
>>> this patch.
>>
>> Sudeep, Mark, ping ?
>>
>
> Looks fine to me. I just wanted to test on KVM which I had broke once
> previously though this change is pretty straight forward and simple.
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
I applied the patch for 4.1.
Thanks !
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-17 9:46 [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-25 21:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-01 13:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-03-03 11:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 11:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-03 11:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-03 15:41 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F5D60F.9040602@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.