From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Dreyer Subject: Re: v0.80.8 and librbd performance Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:28:02 -0700 Message-ID: <54F64382.7060308@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org Sender: "ceph-users" To: Sage Weil , ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org On 03/03/2015 04:19 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > Hi, > > This is just a heads up that we've identified a performance regression in > v0.80.8 from previous firefly releases. A v0.80.9 is working it's way > through QA and should be out in a few days. If you haven't upgraded yet > you may want to wait. > > Thanks! > sage Hi Sage, I've seen a couple Redmine tickets on this (eg http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854 , http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10956). It's not totally clear to me which of the 70+ unreleased commits on the firefly branch fix this librbd issue. Is it only the three commits in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3410 , or are there more? - Ken