From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:13:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F77581.4070300@monom.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150304160136.57a75e8e@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
On 03/04/2015 10:01 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I pulled down the most recent Fedora rawhide kernel today:
>
> 4.0.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc23.x86_64
>
> ...and with that, I can't reproduce this. The ftrace_event_field slab
> (which is shared by the fasync_struct cache) seems to stay under
> control. I see it hover around 3-4M in size while the test is running
> but the box isn't falling over or anything.
>
> Perhaps this was an MM or RCU bug that is now fixed? Can you confirm
> whether you're still able to reproduce it with the most recent mainline
> kernels?
Sure, I'll give tomorrow a spin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 14:25 [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock Daniel Wagner
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 1/4] locks: Remove unnecessary IS_POSIX test Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 2/4] locks: Add lockdep assertion for blocked_lock_lock Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 14:20 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-03-04 15:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-04 15:32 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-03-04 17:59 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:01 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:12 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:13 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 4/4] locks: Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:58 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 15:23 ` [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 16:44 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F77581.4070300@monom.org \
--to=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=jlayton@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.