From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7095965494649599870=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve genl with a message builder
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:22:11 +0200
Message-ID: <54F80423.1090108@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <6DDA26A3-DC7B-406C-9881-BBB8CCCAD1C9@holtmann.org>
List-Id: <ell.lists.01.org>
To: ell@lists.01.org

--===============7095965494649599870==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Marcel,

My sentence was not clear, sorry. I was not criticizing the unit test =

process, I really do want it also,
instead of blindly using the api.

It's just finding out proper raw messages to test against. I found one =

command that has
one nested attribute, but I also would like to get some more complicated =

ones as this api will
be used in every places in our code. It's more time consuming and less =

fun than writing the
api itself ;)  (and yes I am using iwmon hopefully)

Tomasz

--===============7095965494649599870==--