From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] allow domain heap allocations to specify more than one NUMA node Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:18:50 +0000 Message-ID: <54F881EA.2050907@citrix.com> References: <54EF315902000078000640FF@mail.emea.novell.com> <54EF337C0200007800064140@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YTYfr-0002jf-8p for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:30:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54EF337C0200007800064140@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson , Dario Faggioli , Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 26/02/15 13:53, Jan Beulich wrote: > ... using struct domain as a container for passing the respective > affinity mask: Quite a number of allocations are domain specific, yet > not to be accounted for that domain. Introduce a flag suppressing the > accounting altogether (i.e. going beyond MEMF_no_refcount) and use it > right away in common code (x86 and IOMMU code will get adjusted > subsequently). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper