All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Harry <harry@pythonanywhere.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: "developers@pythonanywhere.com" <developers@pythonanywhere.com>
Subject: Re: trying to avoid a lengthy quotacheck by deleting all quota data
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:27:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F89201.60805@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F88CEC.4030009@pythonanywhere.com>

On 3/5/15 11:05 AM, Harry wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Eric.
> 
> One of our problems is that we're limited in terms of what
> manipulations we can apply to the live system, and so instead we've
> been running our experiments against the backup system, and you're
> quite right that DRBD may be introducing some weirdness of its own,
> so those experiments may not be safe to draw conclusions from.
> 
> Here's what we know about the live system
> -> it had an outage, equivalent to having its power cable yanked, or doing an 'echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger'
> -> when it came back, it decided to mount the drive without quotas.
> -> we saw a message in syslog saying " Failed to initialize disk quotas"
> -> last time we had to run a quotacheck (several months ago) it took about 2 hours.
> 
> We can repro the quotacheck issue on our test clusters, as follows:
> -> kick off a job that writes to the disk
> -> hard reboot with "echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger"
> -> on next boot, see "Failed to initialize disk quotas" message, xfs mounts without quotas
> -> soft reboot with "reboot"
> -> on next boot, see "Quotacheck needed: Please wait." message.
> -> Quotacheck completes some time later.
> 
> So our best-case scenario is that, next time we reboot, we'll have an
> outage of about 2 hours. And our paranoid worst-case scenario,
> induced by our experiments with our drbd backup drives, are that the
> disk will actually turn out not to be mountable at all.
> 
> is that "quotacheck always required after hard reboot" behaviour that
> we're observing something you expected? you seemed to be saying that
> the fact that quota are journaled should mean it's not needed?

In general, that's correct.  It's not clear why "Failed to initialize disk quotas"
appeared; that seems closer to the root cause.  But again, we don't have your
full logs to look at, I don't know if anything else offers a clue.  (For that
matter, we don't even know what kernel version you're on...)

here, on a recent 4.0-rc1 kernel:

# mount -o quota /dev/sdc6 /mnt/test
# cp -aR /lib/modules/ /mnt/test
# echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger

[152807.209688] sysrq: SysRq : Resetting
...
<reboots>

# mount -o quota /dev/sdc6 /mnt/test
# dmesg | tail -n 3
[   90.822601] XFS (sdc6): Mounting V4 Filesystem
[   90.921346] XFS (sdc6): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
[   93.399133] XFS (sdc6): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
#

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-05 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24 15:15 trying to avoid a lengthy quotacheck by deleting all quota data Harry
2015-02-24 16:39 ` Harry
2015-02-24 17:33 ` Ben Myers
2015-02-24 17:59   ` Harry Percival
2015-02-24 18:12     ` Ben Myers
2015-02-24 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-26 13:07   ` Harry
2015-03-05 13:15     ` Harry
2015-03-05 15:53       ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-05 17:05         ` Harry
2015-03-05 17:09           ` Harry
2015-03-05 17:27           ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-03-05 17:34             ` Harry
2015-03-05 17:44               ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-05 18:07                 ` Harry
2015-03-05 20:08                   ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-06 11:27                     ` Harry Percival
2015-03-06 21:11                       ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-25 12:34                         ` Harry Percival
2015-03-07 13:41                   ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F89201.60805@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=developers@pythonanywhere.com \
    --cc=harry@pythonanywhere.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.